[License-discuss] Thoughts on the subject of ethical licenses

[andrew.dema]

> There is no mutual ground for discussionI'm glad you've come to such a decisive conclusion. If you don't mind, we all get to make that decision for ourselves as well as when to stop soliciting feedback. If you have nothing to add or feel it is not compatible, that's fine you may be right but others may have more or other viewpoints to support your claim, or not. Last I checked this was a discussion not a trial.
-------- Original message --------From: Russell Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> Date: 2020-03-11  9:35 p.m.  (GMT-05:00) To: license-discuss at lists.opensource.org Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Thoughts on the subject of ethical licenses On 3/11/20 8:10 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:> didn't ever really discuss> the merits of ethical clauses (or lack thereof).Yes, I did. Went through all of them one by one, showing that they were not compatible with the OSD, and analyzed the idea of putting restrictions on the USE of software versus the DISTRIBUTION of software. No response from Coraline. Why not? Because the ESD's very *goal* is contrary to the goal of the OSD.There is no mutual ground for discussion._______________________________________________License-discuss mailing listLicense-discuss at lists.opensource.orghttp://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20200311/1aec0ec1/attachment-0001.html>