[License-discuss] What should fit in a FOSS license?

[Rick Moen]

Quoting Pamela Chestek (pamela at chesteklegal.com):

> Have you been reading the rationale documents I've been writing (for
> both approved and unapproved licenses) since I became chair? Is that not
> what you mean?
> 
> CALv1:
> https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Archived+Discussions+on+Not+Approved+Licenses/Rationale+Vaccine+License/

Probable intended URL for above:
https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Working+Groups+%26+Incubator+Projects/Archived+Discussions+on+Not+Approved+Licenses/Rationale+Cryptographic+Autonomy+License/

> Vaccine License:
> https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Archived+Discussions+on+Not+Approved+Licenses/Rationale+Vaccine+License/
> 
> They're linked from the rejected licenses page.

Since this ought to be said more often and more loudly:  Thank you, Pam.
These are small miracles of clarity and enlightenment.

Index page ('rejected licenses page') is here:
https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Archived+Discussions+on+Not+Approved+Licenses/

-- 
Cheers,                     « Le doute n'est pas une état bien agréable, mais
Rick Moen                   l'assurance est un état ridicule. »  ("Doubt is not 
rick at linuxmafia.com         a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.')
McQ! (4x80)                                                       -- Voltaire