[License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list
rfontana at redhat.com
Fri May 24 02:47:55 UTC 2019
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:07 PM Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
<nweinsto at qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> In reviewing the OSD, some sections explicitly reference the license, such as section 3, while others explicitly reference the program, such as section 2. It's interesting to note that section 7, the one that Richard identified as relevant to the CC0 discussion, says "The rights attached to the program..." which isn't clearly either one.
I have always seen that as being about the license; it says "without
the need for execution of an additional license".
More information about the License-discuss