[License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License]

Pamela Chestek pamela at chesteklegal.com
Mon May 20 13:06:34 UTC 2019

On 5/19/19 5:23 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> Statistically, you may be right, but I'd still like to challenge this.
> It is my belief that the list is merely functioning efficiently. I
> often read review discussions, and if I agree with the
> majority/consensus, I stay silent. It doesn't mean I'm not active.

That may be true of you, but there are some bullies on the lists. That
means that some who disagree may be silent because they don't want to be
bullied. So we can't assume that silence means agreement.


Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com

More information about the License-discuss mailing list