[License-discuss] For Discussion: Cryptographic Autonomy License (CAL) Beta 2

Smith, McCoy mccoy.smith at intel.com
Tue Aug 13 16:20:31 UTC 2019

>>From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-bounces at lists.opensource.org] On Behalf Of Simon Phipps
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 9:06 AM
>>To: license-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>>Subject: Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Cryptographic Autonomy License (CAL) Beta 2

>>Can you explain why this is "problematic" in relation to OSD 9 please Richard? To my eyes the phrase "any modifications, elaborations, or implementations created by You that contain any licenseable >>portion of the Work" clearly bounds the effect to derivations of the licensed software and not to unrelated software distributed alongside.

That was my reaction as well.
Although I dislike use of the noun “elaborations” (what is that intended to encompass?) and assume “implementations” is intended to capture a reciprocal effect via patents?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190813/8783d407/attachment.html>

More information about the License-discuss mailing list