[License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil
Tue Feb 28 16:23:12 UTC 2017
All, the folks at code.mil came up with what may be a really, really good
idea; see
https://github.com/deptofdefense/code.mil/blob/master/Proposal/CONTRIBUTING.md.
The basic idea is simple; when the Government releases code, it's in the
public domain (likely CC0). The project owners select an OSI-approved
license, and will only accept contributions to the project under their chosen
license[1]. Over time the code base becomes a mixture, some of which is under
CC0, and some of which is under the OSI-approved license. I've talked with
ARL's lawyers, and they are satisfied with this solution. Would OSI be happy
with this solution? That is, would OSI recognize the projects as being truly
Open Source, right from the start? The caveat is that some projects will be
100% CC0 at the start, and can only use the chosen Open Source license on
those contributions that have copyright attached. Note that Government
projects that wish to make this claim would have to choose their license and
announce it on the project site so that everyone knows what they are licensing
their contributions under, which is the way that OSI can validate that the
project is keeping its end of the bargain at the start.
If this will satisfy OSI, then I will gladly withdraw the ARL OSL from
consideration. If there are NASA or other Government folks on here, would
this solution satisfy your needs as well?
Thanks,
Cem Karan
[1] There is also a form certifying that the contributor has the right to do
so, etc. The Army Research Laboratory's is at
https://github.com/USArmyResearchLab/ARL-Open-Source-Guidance-and-Instructions/blob/master/ARL%20Form%20-%20266.pdf,
and is, unfortunately, only able to be opened in Adobe Acrobat. We're working
to fix that, but there are other requirements that will take some time.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6419 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170228/9a04e4d9/attachment.p7s>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list