[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil
Tue Aug 29 20:44:41 UTC 2017
> -----Original Message-----
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-bounces at opensource.org] On
> Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H.
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 2:32 PM
> To: license-discuss at opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and
> the US Government
> CC has to submit CC0 according to tradition/rules. For them to bother, since
> they won't amend CC0 itself, probably there needs to be
> some assurance it will at least get a vote at the next board meeting, if not
> assurance it would pass.
> Neither seems likely.
> Easier to just to shrug their shoulders and ignore the whole OSI approval
Well, that's a pain. In that case, unless NOSA 2.0 gets approved, I suspect
that at least some Government code is going to be zombie code, partly Open
Source and partly CC0.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6419 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the License-discuss