[License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses

Philippe Ombredanne pombredanne at nexb.com
Thu Apr 6 17:18:25 UTC 2017

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 11:07 AM Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:
>> Hey, all-
>> I promised some board members a summary of my investigation in '12-'13
>> into updating, supplementing, or replacing the "popular licenses" list. Here
>> goes.
> Yet another (inevitably flawed) data set:
> https://libraries.io/licenses

With the merit that the all the underlying code is FLOSS.

Another possible source --always biased-- could be Debian's popcon and
some cross ref with debsources.

Philippe Ombredanne

More information about the License-discuss mailing list