[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0
John Cowan
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Thu Aug 18 20:13:51 UTC 2016
Diane Peters scripsit:
> Given this, it remains unclear how a license to the worldwide public would
> be invalidated by a court? Please say more.
Because we don't know what law a foreign court would apply. It might
apply the Berne Convention, and say "This work has a copyright term of
zero years in its home country, so it has a copyright term of zero years
here." Or it might apply its local law as if the work were a local work.
Or it might do something else. Conflicts law is still rather primitive
and unpredictable.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
If you understand, things are just as they are.
if you do not understand, things are just as they are.
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list