[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0

John Cowan cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Thu Aug 18 20:13:51 UTC 2016


Diane Peters scripsit:

> Given this, it remains unclear how a license to the worldwide public would
> be invalidated by a court? Please say more.

Because we don't know what law a foreign court would apply.  It might
apply the Berne Convention, and say "This work has a copyright term of
zero years in its home country, so it has a copyright term of zero years
here."  Or it might apply its local law as if the work were a local work.
Or it might do something else.  Conflicts law is still rather primitive
and unpredictable.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan at ccil.org
If you understand, things are just as they are.
if you do not understand, things are just as they are.



More information about the License-discuss mailing list