[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0

[Tzeng, Nigel H.]

On 8/18/16, 11:03 AM, "License-discuss on behalf of Richard Fontana"
<license-discuss-bounces at opensource.org on behalf of
fontana at sharpeleven.org> wrote:


>As a few have pointed out, all code that is nominally licensed under
>open source licenses will contain noncopyrighted portions.

While true, that¹s because they were not significant enough to have
copyright.

The issue here is for code that is potentially quite substantial.  I would
think that would be a different scenario.