[License-discuss] Shortest copyleft licence

Chris DiBona cdibona at gmail.com
Mon Mar 30 23:31:29 UTC 2015


The wtfpl both isn't copyleft, nor is it a valid copyright license for
software.
On Mar 30, 2015 4:23 PM, "jonathon" <jonathon.blake at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30/03/15 07:40, Tim Makarios wrote
> > Publication Licence [1], which a more careful (automated) word-count
> measures at nearly 800 words.
>
> Isn't the DWTFYL license shorter?
> (I can't override the NSFW search on my browser, to find a copy of that
> license.)
>
> jonathon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20150330/bd4ef856/attachment.html>


More information about the License-discuss mailing list