[License-discuss] Shortest copyleft licence
ChanMaxthon
xcvista at me.com
Mon Mar 30 18:09:16 UTC 2015
Then I would like to propose this Copyleft-modified 2BSDL (or its 3BSDL-based cousin) but how? I would prefer writing the additional clause in the same fashion of the original clauses though.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 22:24, cowan at ccil.org wrote:
>
> Maxthon Chan scripsit:
>
>> Is it favorable to add a copy left clause into 2BSDL to make it copyleft?
>> "You must provide the source code, in its human-preferred format, with
>> this work or any derivatives of this work you created when
>> redistributing."
>
> That's pretty much what the Sleepycat license does. Here's a very lightly
> edited version of its additional clause:
>
> Redistributions in any form must be accompanied by information
> on how to obtain complete source code for the licensed software
> and any accompanying software that uses the licensed software.
> The source code must either be included in the distribution
> or be available for no more than the cost of distribution
> plus a nominal fee, and must be freely redistributable under
> reasonable conditions. For an executable file, complete source
> code means the source code for all modules it contains.
> It does not include source code for modules or files that
> typically accompany the major components of the operating
> system on which the executable file runs.
>
> The restrictions pretty much match those of the GPL2.
> The Sleepycat license itself is redundant and non-templatized,
> so it can't be reused directly. If someone felt like
> proposing something like 2-clause BSD + the above, I for one would
> welcome it. Unlike the GPL, this does not create a new and
> distinct software commons.
>
> --
> John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
> Police in many lands are now complaining that local arrestees are insisting
> on having their Miranda rights read to them, just like perps in American TV
> cop shows. When it's explained to them that they are in a different country,
> where those rights do not exist, they become outraged. --Neal Stephenson
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list