[License-discuss] CDDL 1.0 vs. 1.1

[Simon Phipps]

Sun never bothered to request approval for 1.1 as the lawyers involved
regarded the changes as trivial.

S.


On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Mike Milinkovich <
mike.milinkovich at eclipse.org> wrote:

>
> I note that Glassfish uses CDDL 1.1
> <https://glassfish.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL_1_1.html>, but that all
> references on the OSI website are to CDDL 1.0
> <http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0>.
>
> Does anyone know the reason why there is this version mismatch? Did
> something fall through the cracks here, or is there some longer story?
>
> --
> Mike Milinkovich
> mike.milinkovich at eclipse.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
>
>


-- 
Simon Phipps*, Director, The Open Source Initiative*
+44 238 098 7027 or +1 415 683 7660 : www.opensource.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20151211/f5bbba4a/attachment.html>