[License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"?

[Philip Odence]

touché
Maybe than “licenses that people think they understand"

From: Lawrence Rosen <lrosen at rosenlaw.com<mailto:lrosen at rosenlaw.com>>
Reply-To: <lrosen at rosenlaw.com<mailto:lrosen at rosenlaw.com>>, <license-discuss at opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss at opensource.org>>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:33:10 -0700
To: <license-discuss at opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss at opensource.org>>
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"?

Philip Odence suggested:
> Hey maybe “well-understood” is a good alternative to “standard."

Note that the GPL is one of the "least-understood" licenses around, even by some of its supporters who make the most outrageous claims about linking. :-)

/Larry

From: Philip Odence [mailto:podence at blackducksoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:52 AM
To: lrosen at rosenlaw.com<mailto:lrosen at rosenlaw.com>; license-discuss at opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss at opensource.org>
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"?
<snip>
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss at opensource.org<mailto:License-discuss at opensource.org> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20140429/65f88e91/attachment.html>