[License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"?

[Richard Fontana]

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:31:06 -0700
Ben Tilly <btilly at gmail.com> wrote:

> Suggested solution, can we use the word "common" instead of
> "standard"?  And our definition of common should be something
> relatively objective, like the top X licenses in use on github, minus
> licenses (like the GPL v2) whose authors are pushing to replace with a
> different license. 

You'd exclude the most commonly-used FLOSS license from "common"?

 - RF