[License-discuss] [FAQ] Is <some PHP program> Open Source?
Lawrence Rosen
lrosen at rosenlaw.com
Fri Jan 25 19:35:01 UTC 2013
Here is a useful and explicit definition you may want to use:
The term "Source Code" means the preferred form of the Original Work
for making modifications to it and all available documentation
describing
how to modify the Original Work.
http://opensource.org/licenses/OSL-3.0 (section 3)
In all other respects, a copyrightable work (i.e., an Original Work) is the
same work regardless of what form it is in.
It is "open source" if it is licensed under an open source license *and*
available in a Source Code form (whatever form that may be, depending on the
programming language and the technology).
/Larry
Lawrence Rosen
Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com)
3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482
Office: 707-485-1242
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Fontana [mailto:rfontana at redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 6:54 AM
To: license-discuss at opensource.org
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [FAQ] Is <some PHP program> Open Source?
Would it be clearer to say:
I have some code written in a scripting language. Does that mean
it's open source by definition?
'Source code for a program written in a script language' is confusing to me
because, as phrased, it could describe situations where the 'source code'
spoken of is different from the 'program written in a script language'. In
some such situations, the source code could be open source and the program
might be non-open source.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:37:18PM -0200, Bruno Souza wrote:
> How about being more to the point:
>
> Just because I have the source code for a program written in a script
> language should I consider it open source?
>
> We could reference a few script languages on the answer.
>
> Bruno.
> ----
> Weird? Mobile.
>
> On Jan 25, 2013 10:06 AM, "Reincke, Karsten" <k.reincke at telekom.de> wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > >
> > > "You can see the PHP source code, so it's Open Source, right?"
> >
> > That could be misleading, since "the PHP source code" could mean
> > https://github.com/php/php-src.
> >
> > How about:
> >
> > "FooProgram is written in PHP, and I have the source code. Does
that
> > mean it's definitely open source?"
> >
> > Matt Flaschen
> > ___
>
> Perhaps this should be generalized because it's not specific for PHP,
but
> relevant for all interpreter languages:
>
> "FooProgram is written in ScriptLanguageBar, and I have the source
code.
> Does that mean it's definitely open source?"
>
> Best regards Karsten Reincke
>
> ---
> Deutsche Telekom AG
> Products & Innovation
> Karsten Reincke, PMP(r)
> Fach-Senior Manager
> Open Source Review Board - T&P/A&S/TM
> T-Online-Allee 1
> 64295 Darmstadt
> Tel.: +49 6151 680 - 8941
> Fax.: +49 6151 680 - 2529
> E-Mail k.reincke at telekom.de
> http://www.telekom.de/
>
> Erleben, was verbindet.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
>
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discus
> s
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discus
> s
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss at opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list