[License-discuss] License which requires watermarking? (Attribution Provision)
lists at eitanadler.com
Tue Jan 1 23:50:38 UTC 2013
On 1 January 2013 17:08, Ken Arromdee <arromdee at rahul.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Rick Moen wrote:
>> I conclude that, in general, the overwhelming majority of such
>> entrepreneurs are thus seeking the crippling of competing commercial
>> reuse -- not just attribution. So, OSI should give them the bum's rush.
> Is the GPL also considered
> unfree when applied to libraries?
Many would argue, yes.
More information about the License-discuss