[License-discuss] Open source license chooser choosealicense.com launched.
roberta.cairney at cairneylawoffices.com
Wed Aug 28 19:23:10 UTC 2013
For what it is worth, I am a lawyer that does work in the open source world and I have found the recent discussions, including the Rosen/Kuhn dialog, to be among the interesting and valuable discussions that I've seen on this list in a while.
And yes, I have been doing open source work long enough to appreciate the fact that it's not the first time that these issues have come up--the discussion still has value.
From: Lawrence Rosen <lrosen at rosenlaw.com>
To: license-discuss at opensource.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Open source license chooser choosealicense.com launched.
I refuse your request to be silent. What is more important to this list than
this discussion? I won't just sit here like a lump while Bradley and others
continue to encourage OSI to accept erroneous theories about license
proliferation and while various groups implement FOSS "license choosers"
that ignore legal analysis.
If you believe that this or any other list is overflowing, open your drain
From: Luis Villa [mailto:luis at lu.is]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:26 AM
To: License Discuss; Lawrence Rosen; Bradley M. Kuhn
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Open source license chooser
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn at ebb.org> wrote:
> I don't think we need to (or should have) this debate (again) here
Yes, please, let's not rehash this discussion here. It's been done many
times, and the list is already overflowing this week.
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss at opensource.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-discuss