[License-discuss] Is the old style MIT license a Free Software license
Bruce Perens
bruce at perens.com
Tue Mar 13 19:36:35 UTC 2012
On 03/13/2012 12:31 PM, Karl Fogel wrote:
> I believe the "without fee" here refers to payment to the original
> licensor
Yes. The statement is "permission [to exercise a number of rights] is
hereby granted without fee."
If it were "permission [to exercise a number of rights] without fee is
hereby granted", the answer would be different.
Thanks
Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120313/87de21ed/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120313/87de21ed/attachment.p7s>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list