[License-discuss] [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]

Russ Nelson nelson at crynwr.com
Sat Mar 10 19:05:35 UTC 2012

CC removed again. We're not reviewing a license anymore since CC0 has
been withdrawn. We're either wanking, or preparing an information base
for the patent policy committe.

Alexander Terekhov writes:
 > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:
 > [...]
 > > Now, in this particular case, Mr. Moen has pointed to a web page of
 > > his which addresses Dr. Bernstein's arguments. There is NO POINT in
 > > copying from Dr. Bernstein's web page arguments which have already
 > > been replied-to. You should look at Mr. Moen's page, and address his
 > I've looked at
 > http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/public-domain.html
 > and I can tell you that anyone with even a little skill to perform
 > research can find out that Mr. Moen is at best deeply mistaken.

In what way? Please be specific about which bits of research refute
which of Mr. Moen's claims.

--my blog is at    http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |     Sheepdog       

More information about the License-discuss mailing list