[License-discuss] [License-review] CC withdrawl of CC0 from OSI process

[Bruce Perens]

The fact that we have not resolved some questions doesn't mean that we 
don't have /any/ bright lines. I have previously published guidelines 
that would keep you far from any fuzzy issues, while allowing you to 
build whatever you wish.

On 03/01/2012 07:42 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Which is as much to say, the wise person will use proprietary software 
> to the full extent he can afford it, because there is no issue of 
> copyright licensure, there is indemnity de facto or ex contractu from 
> patent lawsuits, etc. etc. This leads to a vast amount of 
> wheel-reinvention, but overall that is cheaper than defending lawsuits. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120301/307379c0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120301/307379c0/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120301/307379c0/attachment.p7s>