[License-discuss] [Board] Alternative Proposal: The OSI licensing pages

[Karl Fogel]

"Lawrence Rosen" <lrosen at rosenlaw.com> writes:
>LER recommends that this is what the OSI landing page ought to say:

I got confused by the "LER", or maybe by the quoting conventions in the
email (since it seems to have been done via colorization rather than by
nested ">"s ?).  Anyway, was it you who wrote the above line, and if so,
does "LER" refer to you, or if not, then to whom?

Btw, in case the above sounds sarcastic: it's not.  Genuine confusion,
genuine attempt to resolve it, nothing more.

Thanks,
-K

>************
>
> 
>
>An alphabetical listing of all Currently Approved open source licenses
>is shown here. <link>  
>
> 
>
>The Currently Approved list excludes those licenses that have been
>replaced with more recent versions (in which case the most recent
>version has been listed above), or that have been deprecated by their
>original authors. A list of Replaced and Deprecated licenses can be
>found here. <link>
>
> 
>
>Several organizations maintain lists of licenses that they prefer to
>be used for contributions or that they recommend for their community
>participants. Among these Preferred lists are the following:
>
> 
>
>·        Free Software Foundation (FSF) <link>
>
>·        OSI License Proliferation Committee Report <link> [to be
>updated someday?]
>
>·        Apache Software Foundation <link>
>
>·        Eclipse Foundations <link>
>
>·        Google/Android <link>
>
>·        Mozilla Foundation <link>
>
>·        Linux Foundation <link>
>
>·        Open Solaris <link>
>
>·        Etc.
>
> 
>
>Various organizations identify Popular open source licenses based on
>surveys and other criteria. These lists are available on their
>websites:
>
> 
>
>·        Black Duck Software <link>
>
>·        Etc.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Board mailing list
>Board at opensource.org
>http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/board