[License-discuss] GPL and non-GPL binaries in one distribution

Richard Fontana rfontana at redhat.com
Fri Jan 13 01:51:34 UTC 2012

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:34:45PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> If the FSF's is the more restrictive interpretation, you then
> need to consider cases where the FSF has taken up the mantle of defender
> of works for which it arguably did not have a notable direct copyright
> interest, as in the Busybox mess 

You appear to be mixing up either SFLC or SFC with FSF.

- RF

More information about the License-discuss mailing list