[License-discuss] What would be necessary to consider the unlicense?

[Bruce Perens]

On 02/26/2012 05:50 PM, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> So, what makes unlicense and these public domain statements alluring 
> is that they serve as vehicles for their authors make a statement 
> about public policy.
Yes, but the sentiment is so poorly directed that it's the one from 
/Henry VI.

/For all of the talk, there is no credible political organization 
working against software patenting today. In the past I've tried to get 
support for one, to no avail.

     Thanks

     Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120226/7568b1fd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120226/7568b1fd/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120226/7568b1fd/attachment.p7s>