[License-discuss] License which requires watermarking? (Attribution Provision)

ldr ldr stackoverflowuser95 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 25 06:00:02 UTC 2012

You know what, I think I am!

Thank you so much, this is the reason I joined the license-discuss
mailing-list =D

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> wrote:
> On 24 December 2012 22:10, ldr ldr <stackoverflowuser95 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> John: I'd be happy with proprietary forks, as long as the Attribution
>> provision would hold.
>> E.g.: if they sell it to other people, those other people still are
>> aware of my original project and have a link to it
> Aren't you looking for something similar to the 4-BSD license?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses#4-clause_license_.28original_.22BSD_License.22.29
> --
> Eitan Adler
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

More information about the License-discuss mailing list