Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
Oleksandr Gavenko
gavenkoa at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 20:08:12 UTC 2011
07.09.2011 22:47, Karl Fogel пишет:
> Oleksandr Gavenko<gavenkoa at gmail.com> writes:
>> is in the public domain, that thing **is** open source. ==>
>> that thing **can be used** open source without any restrictions
>
> Yes, I believe these should be equivalent, since "meeting the OSD" is
> the same as "meeting the OSD", ahem :-).
>
Sorry I miss **in**.
I think that all agree that:
If thing is in public domain, that thing **can be used in** open
source and/or without any restrictions.
But...
In general case Public domain is not agreement between author and
user.
http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd always state:
'licence shall not ...'
'licence must allow ...'
Statement that PB work also satisfy "The Open Source Definition"
is danger in this case as we need know that mean *licence*
in case of PB.
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list