My mail about Python licensing did not go through?
Karl Fogel
kfogel at red-bean.com
Sun Jun 5 19:40:56 UTC 2011
Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> writes:
>Karl Fogel writes:
> > Russ, or anyone, does some moderation need to happen here?
>
>You sent it from your gmail account, which isn't subscribed to the
>list. I'll add it to the allow list so you can post from either
>address.
Thanks for adding that to the allow list.
I send mail using Google's smtp servers, but I sent this mail *as*
kfogel at red-bean.com -- the "From" header is from kfogel at red-bean.com (as
is "Reply-to", though that shouldn't matter for our purposes).
However, the "Sender" and "Return-Path" headers say kfogel at gmail.com.
Maybe the list software was looking at those instead of at "From"?
Below is the full header on the sent mail, if that helps.
Return-Path: <kfogel at gmail.com>
Received: from floss (cpe-66-108-144-62.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.144.62])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bk7sm1677208vbb.13.2011.05.29.11.33.04
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sun, 29 May 2011 11:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Karl Fogel <kfogel at gmail.com>
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel at red-bean.com>
To: license-review at opensource.org,
license-discuss at opensource.org
Subject: The Python licensing situation.
Reply-To: Karl Fogel <kfogel at red-bean.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:33:03 -0400
Message-ID: <87vcwtqrvk.fsf at red-bean.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list