Which DUAL Licence should I choose.

[Chad Perrin]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 02:04:31PM +0100, Alexandre Terekhov wrote:
> 
> Non-proprietary is known as public domain.
> 
> As long as OSI-listed documents do NOT disclaim copyright ownership,
> they are all proprietary licenses. The OSI-blessed choice of
> consideration in exchange to license grant does not make the licensees
> less proprietary.

You are aware you are using terms in ways that conflict with the way most
people understand them -- right?

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20110816/79005597/attachment.sig>