commercial distribution

[Karl Fogel]

"Ippersiel, Luc André" <luc_andre at lucandreippersiel.ca> writes:
>Hi Karl,
>I was on a dull conference call and redid the formatting. Hope it's to
>everyone's satisfaction?

Hey, thanks!  I've applied it to the page now.  Looks much better.

Mark Shewmaker wrote:
> Could section 4 be broken out into indenting for the A) and B)
> sections?

Well, short bits like that aren't typically broken out into indentation.
Also in the case of section 4, the (a) point would be tiny and then the
(b) point would be much bigger, which would look odd.  So I think I'd
prefer to leave the formatting there as-is.

Best,
-Karl

>On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Karl Fogel <kfogel at red-bean.com>
>wrote:
>
>    Ben Tilly <btilly at gmail.com> writes:
>    
>    >Thank you, it is massively better.
>    >
>    >But it would be nice if things like 8.2.a were indented from 8.2.
>     It
>    >also seems odd to me that 6.3.a and 6.3.b were broken out onto
>    their
>    >own lines.
>    
>    
>    I was going for speed :-), since I've got a bunch of conference
>    calls
>    today.  But I agree with you that the formatting could be better.
>    
>    Here at OSI we're all about opportunities for volunteerism -- or
>    we'd
>    like to be, at least -- , so I'm going to attach the HTML to this
>    email,
>    and if you have to do the reformatting and post it here, I'll load
>    the
>    new version back into the page!
>    
>    No obligation nor pressure, of course; either way is fine.  I just
>    don't
>    want to be the bottleneck, and it sounds like you have a clear
>    idea of
>    how the page could be improved.
>    
>    Best,
>    -Karl
>    
>