Towards an OSI-approved "waive all rights" software license
Richard Fontana
rfontana at redhat.com
Mon Apr 18 18:19:52 UTC 2011
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:00:21AM -0700, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
> 2. The CC0 license says nothing about patents. I find this particularly
> troubling when a CC0 license (or the BSD license, for that matter!) is used
> for software or specifications by companies that have large patent
> portfolios.
In fact CC0 explicitly excludes any licensing of patents.
No trademark or patent rights held by Affirmer are waived,
abandoned, surrendered, licensed or otherwise affected by this
document.
I am not too troubled by that to the extent CC0 continues to be
applied to rather trivial pieces of code, but use of CC0 on a
substantial body of code might be another matter.
I have recently suggested to Creative Commons that the issue should
perhaps be revisited in future versions of CC0, now that its
suitability for software has been acknowledged.
- RF
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list