Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously

[David Woolley]

Chris Travers wrote:
> 2010/2/27 John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>:
>> André Barbosa scripsit:
>>
>>> Then I though about releasing without any license,
>> If you do that, *nobody* except you has any right to copy or reuse the code
>> at all, and since it's impossible to download code without making a copy,
>> this is more or less pointless,
> 
> Andre:
> 
> If you mean you would consider releasing it to the public domain, you
> would definitely want to say so.

There is doubt as to whether it is possible to release into the public 
domain in the USA.  It is almost certainly impossible in the UK.

It is generally not advisable, because it is unsafe to use code unless 
you can verify that you have a licence to use it.

> 
> "No license" otherwise means "all rights reserved."
> 


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.