GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms
luis.villa at gmail.com
Wed Apr 21 22:09:35 UTC 2010
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:02 PM, <opensource.*.nwo at neverbox.com> wrote:
> As for secretive, nothing explains why didn't they at least devoted a whole
> question to permissions vs. restrictions and detailed explanations of
'nothing explains'? Perhaps no one has directly asked them yet?
Perhaps they find it mostly self-explanatory? Perhaps they are waiting
to see how it is used in practice before setting down an 'official'
opinion? Certainly one can't rule out malicious secrecy, but there are
plenty of other alternative explanations.
More information about the License-discuss