Questions about the two-clause BSD license
des at des.no
Mon Oct 19 16:58:24 UTC 2009
Pimm Hogeling <pimmhogeling at gmail.com> writes:
> We seem to agree that including the license itself with the binary
> form is pointless because it doesn't actually have any effect, though
> it is required by the license.
It is pointless in my iPod scenario, but there are others in which it is
possible, in fact almost trivial, to separate at least some of the
BSD-licensed code from the proprietary code: Mac OS X, for instance, or
a Juniper router.
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the License-discuss