Questions about the two-clause BSD license

Dag-Erling Smørgrav des at
Mon Oct 19 16:58:24 UTC 2009

Pimm Hogeling <pimmhogeling at> writes:
> We seem to agree that including the license itself with the binary
> form is pointless because it doesn't actually have any effect, though
> it is required by the license.

It is pointless in my iPod scenario, but there are others in which it is
possible, in fact almost trivial, to separate at least some of the
BSD-licensed code from the proprietary code: Mac OS X, for instance, or
a Juniper router.

Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at

More information about the License-discuss mailing list