Questions about the two-clause BSD license
Chuck Swiger
chuck at codefab.com
Sun Oct 18 22:28:27 UTC 2009
Hello--
On Oct 18, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Pimm Hogeling wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
>> However, rather than worry about semantic details, why don't you just
>> include a copy of the license as a separate file in the distribution?
>
> I, personally, have no problem with that. However, as I want this
> library to be as widely spread as possible, I don't want to obligate
> the licensees more than I have to.
OK. It's possible that the ISC license or the MIT/X11 license might
suit you a little better, although the 2-clause BSD license is nearly
identical in practical effect to those other alternatives.
> If I look at the two-clause BSD license really close, I believe it has
> more restrictions than I find necessary. Specifically the binary
> form-clause could be less restrictive.
>
> The clause states that binary forms must reproduce the copyright
> notice, the list of conditions, and the disclaimer. I could imagine
> that such an obligation will scare off some people.
I admire your imagination, but anyone with such concerns would be
unlikely to use a computer all, since every operating system I'm aware
of-- aside from the BSD flavors-- contains more restrictive licensing
terms (usually much more: see the Windows and MacOS X EULAs, the GPL
for Linux & derivatives, the CDDL for OpenSolaris, etc).
> I'd like to discuss how much of that clause is actually functional,
> and what could
> be left out, putting less obligations on the licensees.
If you're talking about your own works, you are free to license them
under whatever terms you please. If you're talking about someone
else's work which is already under the 2-clause BSD license, then all
of the clauses are functional.
[ ... ]
> What are your thoughts on this?
You are worrying about a non-issue. The obligation to keep the
copyright statement intact is typically required by law (cf 17 USC
section 506(c) or your local equivalent), and the obligation to keep
the license terms & disclaimer intact is a common basic part of all
(or nearly) all licenses.
Regards,
--
-Chuck
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list