Apache 2 License vs OSI definition
des at des.no
Fri Jul 17 07:53:12 UTC 2009
Johannes Buchner <buchner.johannes at gmx.at> writes:
> OSI definition states in (2):
> "The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in
> source code as well as compiled form. Where some form of a product is
> not distributed with source code, there must be a well-publicized means
> of obtaining the source code ..."
> I realise that Apache 2 is not a viral license, but if you do not have
> to give away your modified source code or the original source code,
> /ever/, how can it be OSI-certified?
You're confusing original distribution with redistribution, and the open
source defintion with the requirements placed on open source licenses.
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the License-discuss