BSD and MIT license "compliance" with the MS-PL
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Sat Apr 18 06:41:44 UTC 2009
Donovan Hawkins wrote:
> As for copyleft, I'll use as the definition that "copyleft is a tool
> to ensure permissions are maintained during distribution," as opposed
> to copyright which is a tool to ensure that restrictions are
> maintained during distribution. It's simple, fits the reason the word
> was chosen, and matches the FSF's own description of the principles
> fairly well.
I would agree that's an equivalent formulation.
> Weak copyleft is perhaps harder to define, but it generally draws
> some sort of distinction between modifying the original code and
> using the code in a larger project. It certainly can't mean only
> ensuring permissions for some of the people who use the same piece of
> software...that isn't weak copyleft, it's broken copyleft.
I agree. Weak copyleft means all of the people, but only part of the
> Still, it does pass the license proliferation test: it is unique in
> combining the most restrictive license terms available for open
> source with the most permissive license terms available for closed source.
Agreed. You certainly can't fault the creativity (there are other words
for it) of MS's legal team.
More information about the License-discuss