Request for approval: EUPL (European Union Public Licence)

[Russ Nelson]

Why are you CC'ing license-discuss on this?  Please see the new
mailing list definitions at http://opensource.org/lists .
license-review is for reviewing licenses for approval.  If you want to
have input on new license approvals, you should be on license-review.
Send any piece of email to license-review-subscribe at opensource.org .
-russ

Matthew Flaschen writes:
 > David Woolley wrote:
 > > Firstly one should never request read receipts on public mailing lists, 
 > > it is considered an invasion of privacy; similarly for delivery receipts.
 > > 
 > > Ian Vernon wrote:
 > > 
 > >> I wonder if there is a need for OSI to approve any version of the license
 > >> since it already came into law in 2007 and considering what is 
 > >> intended for:
 > > 
 > > That doesn't make sense.  It is possible for statute to make it 
 > > impossible to have an open source licence within a jurisdiction.
 > 
 > I think the problem here is the license-review/license-discuss divide. 
 > The license was sent to license-review for approval.  I sent my reply to 
 > license-discuss only, out of habit, and didn't make the context clear.
 > 
 > I just resent the original comments to license-review as well.
 > 
 > Matt Flaschen