What is considered off-site usage?
Dirk Dierickx
dirk.dierickx at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 21:32:21 UTC 2008
At my workplace we're still having problems with the GPL licensed
software, just now we had to take down a wiki because it was GPL
licensed. Complete madness, but so far i have not been able to get
through to our legal dept.
I continue to do research because i know there is not an issue but
it's difficult to build a good case, especially against these legal
types. When skimming through the GPL faq i found the following;
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InternalDistribution
The part of interest is this;
"However, when the organization transfers copies to other
organizations or individuals, that is distribution. In particular,
providing copies to contractors for use off-site is distribution."
As we work with contractors a lot, local as well based in India, and
legal has expressed their concerns with the GPL and contractors in
specific, this faq entry is interesting.
It's important that 'off-site distribution' is defined correctly. A
local on-site contractor will be no problem in this case, but do
contractors based in India using the tool over a vpn connection fall
in this category? The server is still ours, it's still our network, is
this 'distribution'?
Thanks for your advice.
Dirk Dierickx
dirk.dierickx at gmail.com
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list