Individual authors recognition
btilly at gmail.com
Thu Jun 5 12:35:42 UTC 2008
On 6/5/08, Xavier Grehant <xavier.grehant at gmail.com> wrote:
> > May be what you're looking for is the Artistic License.
> Indeed, this is the one I chose in the end. I especially like the
> exclusion of works "that merely extend or make use of the Package"
> like "scripts" or "interfaces". These are easy ways to hide the origin
> of a work, and I'm glad to find a license that takes care of it.
> Thank you Philippe for your in-depth answer.
Please note that the original Artistic license was not written by a
lawyer and has a number of issues. The Artistic License 2.0 is a much
better choice to use.
More information about the License-discuss