Our Purpose (Re: DRAFT FAQ: Free vs. Open)
ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com
Fri Jan 11 17:31:45 UTC 2008
On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Then, I think you had better carefully mark
> https://osi.osuosl.org/wiki/help/opensource as _not_ speaking for OSI,
> as many will otherwise assume.
Fair enough. I've expanded the Disclaimer's on:
Does that address your concerns? Or can you suggest better language?
On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> I don't know that NPOV is necessarily appropriate here. OSI /is/ an
> ideological organization, and I think its FAQ should reflect its
> opinions, rather than just any significant opinion on the list (NPOV).
I admit, it isn't an easy balance. However, while I agree that the
FAQ shouldn't naively follow the perspective of the list, I very much
want it to reflect "community consensus", not just the perspective of
the OSI Board (except for the OSI FAQ, which is in the slightly
different category of self-description).
-- Ernie P.
More information about the License-discuss