encforceability of Open Source Licences (Re: (OT) - NOT A Major Blow to Copyleft Theory)

Alexander Terekhov alexander.terekhov at gmail.com
Mon Feb 11 16:56:37 UTC 2008


On Feb 11, 2008 4:53 PM, Tzeng, Nigel H. <Nigel.Tzeng at jhuapl.edu> wrote:
[...]
> Thank goodness for google.  Would have been too hard for someone to point at
> Mark's blog post?
>
> http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-open-source-legal-decision-jacobsen.html
>
> Unfortunately I haven't seen anything beyond this (other than a note in
> December that this was one of the top 10 legal issues involving open source
> in 2007).  But maybe I missed something.

http://blog.actonline.org/2007/09/revisiting-lice.html

Hth.

regards,
alexander.

--
"Notwithstanding Jacobsen's confused discussion of unilateral
contracts, bilateral contracts, implied licenses, "licenses to the
world" and "bare" licenses in his Appellant's Brief, the issue at hand
is fairly simple."

 -- Brief of Appellees (CAFC 2008-1001).



More information about the License-discuss mailing list