(OT) - NOT A Major Blow to Copyleft Theory

[Alexander Terekhov]

On Feb 9, 2008 3:56 PM, Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu> wrote:
[...]
> What I'm "implying" is that your argument is specious.

Hand waving.

>
> > Feel free to bring this to the attention of Microsoft Legal, then.
> > And let me know what they will tell you. TIA.
>
> It's not my job to enforce Microsoft's copyright, and I don't see how
> any of this is relevant to this list.

Quoting Rick Moen (rick at linuxmafia.com):

> I'd personally like to see Terenkov _test_ his theory, using, say, a
> downloaded copy of ...  We then bring this to the attention of ...
> Legal, which should give the man's hypothesis a suitably vigourous
> validation.
>
> I understand that ... Legal are extremely helpful in such matters.
>
> --
> Cheers,                    "Send a policeman, and have it arrested."
> Rick Moen                     -- Otto von Bismarck, when asked what he
> rick at linuxmafia.com               would do if the British Army landed.

regards,
alexander.

--
"Notwithstanding Jacobsen's confused discussion of unilateral
contracts, bilateral contracts, implied licenses, "licenses to the
world" and "bare" licenses in his Appellant's Brief, the issue at hand
is fairly simple."

 -- Brief of Appellees (CAFC 2008-1001).