Open source licenses, using licensed source code under new licenses
cowan at ccil.org
Thu Apr 3 21:07:58 UTC 2008
Ben Tilly scripsit:
> I'm guessing that John Cowan didn't look at the patent provisions in
> the Apache 2.0 license. It is those provisions that make the FSF and
> the Apache foundation say that the Apache 2.0 license can be
> relicensed GPL v3 but not GPL v2. Since the BSD license, like the GPL
> v2, has no patent protection provisions, I would think that you cannot
> relicense the Apache 2.0 license BSD.
Distinguo. The BSD license is silent on patents: it grants you certain
rights and imposes certain restrictions, but doesn't grant you other rights
or impose other restrictions that may apply to you anyway. The GPLv2
has very specific language around patents.
> However I'm not a lawyer. I could be wrong. Talk to a lawyer for a
> legal opinion.
And be prepared for it to be "Don't".
Not to perambulate John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
the corridors http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
during the hours of repose
in the boots of ascension. --Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
More information about the License-discuss