a plea

[Grayg Ralphsnyder]

I agree with Chris, there are a lot of arms and legs that are relevant 
to the main body / topic.  Possibly modifying the message subject line 
with a hyphen and a word or two to describe the sub-point or supporting 
argument, etc.  Then those that do not want to read the 'off-topic' 
materials can just delete them.

grayg ralphsnyder

Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
> On 9/10/07, *Scott Shattuck* <Scott.Shattuck at gmail.com 
> <mailto:Scott.Shattuck at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     +10000
>
>
>     I might even go so far as to suggest that only messages specifically
>     relevant to the following points be acceptable:
>
>     1) a new license or license revision is being submitted;
>     2) a previously submitted license/revision is being withdrawn;
>     3) a submitted license is being questioned relative to conformance
>     with a specific OSI clause
>
>
> How can these be addressed without discussing sub-points, supporting 
> arguments, etc? 
> Wouldn't your proposal provide for approval of licenses with less 
> understanding of what they actually mean? 
> Is that a good thing?
>
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers