For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License

[David Woolley]

Rick Moen wrote:
> 
> This is an ideological construing of the term 'damage' that would carry
> zero weight in tort law.

In that case, how would you draft a licence/contract that did provide 
valid protection of the ideological goals, or what would you suggest 
that open source developers should tell their government representatives 
to demand in new legislation to make this possible?

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.