For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
David Woolley
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Mon Sep 10 09:57:16 UTC 2007
Rick Moen wrote:
>
> This is an ideological construing of the term 'damage' that would carry
> zero weight in tort law.
In that case, how would you draft a licence/contract that did provide
valid protection of the ideological goals, or what would you suggest
that open source developers should tell their government representatives
to demand in new legislation to make this possible?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list