For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
David Woolley
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Sun Sep 9 11:06:00 UTC 2007
Rick Moen wrote:
> I contest your premise, and point you to Catherine and Eric Raymond's
> explanation about why this widely held view is incorrect:
> http://catb.org/~esr/Licensing-HOWTO.html#id2852366
>
bash-3.2$ nslookup www.catb.org
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
whois indicates that it is a personal web site (organisation: private).
If you are saying that most contributions are not copyrightable, I would
agree. If you are saying that the licence for copyrightable
contributions could be changed unilaterally, as a potential contributor
I would really hope that was not the case.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list