For Approval: GPLv3

[Eugene Wee]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Basically, the recent decision by federal district court said that
> Open Source licenses are bunk. Damages? Easterbrook: "Linux and other
> open source projects have been able to cover their fixed costs through
> donations of time."

What exactly does this have to do with the approval of GPLv3 as an OSI 
certified license?

As a non-lawyer pedestrian to this list, I am getting very confused 
here. Open Source licenses are bunk (as in nonsense)? All of them? I had 
the impression that this discussion only concerned the GPL in its two 
most recent versions.

Regards,
Eugene Wee