For Approval: GPLv3
Eugene Wee
eugenew at starhub.net.sg
Sat Sep 1 18:27:26 UTC 2007
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Basically, the recent decision by federal district court said that
> Open Source licenses are bunk. Damages? Easterbrook: "Linux and other
> open source projects have been able to cover their fixed costs through
> donations of time."
What exactly does this have to do with the approval of GPLv3 as an OSI
certified license?
As a non-lawyer pedestrian to this list, I am getting very confused
here. Open Source licenses are bunk (as in nonsense)? All of them? I had
the impression that this discussion only concerned the GPL in its two
most recent versions.
Regards,
Eugene Wee
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list