For Approval: GPLv3
Donovan Hawkins
hawkins at cephira.com
Sat Sep 1 15:12:53 UTC 2007
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> http://www.fsf.org/news/microsoft_response
>
> "We will ensure ... that Microsoft ... complies with our licenses"
>
> ("Microsoft would be bound by GPLv3 to extend that same promise of
> safety to all downstream users of that software")
>
> How is that not a threat of specific performance, Matt?
They seem to be threatening that if Microsoft doesn't comply, the FSF will
get an injunction and stop them from distributing the software at all. An
injunction would technically bring Microsoft into compliance since the
license trivially allows people to not distribute anything.
BTW congrats on the engagement...is your dad going to let you hold the
wedding at the White House?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Donovan Hawkins, PhD "The study of physics will always be
Software Engineer safer than biology, for while the
hawkins at cephira.com hazards of physics drop off as 1/r^2,
http://www.cephira.com biological ones grow exponentially."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list