rms at 1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that...
Alexander Terekhov
alexander.terekhov at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 18:21:32 UTC 2007
On 10/19/07, Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu> wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Why not discuss here on *license discuss* forum (not license approval
> > or some such)
>
> This is ridiculous. The list is not for general copyright law
> discussions, nor for general license
add: contract
> discussions, nor for general
add: license
> contract discussions. It exists so that
add: contract
> licenses submitted to OSI can be discussed before approval.
Why not after? Is the discussion after approval not allowed here?
regards,
alexander.
--
"To show the falsity of 'PJ''s claims, in most cases I need look no further
than Groklaw itself. 'PJ' wants more journalists to use the site as a
resource, so I'll do just that. Below are excerpts from my story that 'PJ'
says are incorrect, followed by 'PJ''s characterization of them, and my
response -- at times taken directly from Groklaw."
-- http://tinyurl.com/2mn3jc
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list