Frameworx license clause 3b
Matthew Flaschen
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Tue Oct 16 05:04:42 UTC 2007
John Cowan wrote:
> Is clause 3b of the Frameworx license really consistent with the OSD?
>
> # Any Value-Added Services that you offer or provide, directly or
> # indirectly, in relation to any Downstream Distribution shall be offered
> # and provided on commercial terms that are reasonably commensurate to the
> # fair market value of such Value-Added Services. In addition, the terms
> # and conditions on which any such Value Added Services are so offered or
> # provided shall be consistent with, and shall fully support, the intent
> # and purpose of this License Agreement.
>
> That sounds like a restraint on commercial (or non-commercial) activity.
It's not a restraint on non-commercial activity, because the definition
of Value-Added Services excludes non-commercial services. However, it's
a restriction on e.g. hosting the program at a non-fair market rate.
If all hosting markets were efficient, there would be no hosting at
unfair rates, so I agree this clause would be moot. However, I don't
think any hosting market is efficient. Besides, a hosting provider
shouldn't have to determine whether they are selling at a fair market
rate (which is actually a complex calculation if you do it right).
Thus, I think this is a OSD #6 violation (it discriminates against
hosting providers) and I hope nothing like this clause would be approved
today.
Matt Flaschen
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list